Akinbola Idowu Olusoji Sanuade

Total Lobbying Efforts: 2

All Officials
Select methods...

Lobbying Records (Page 1 of 1)

2025-03-31
Politician(s) lobbied: Helen McEntee (Minister), Department of Justice; Darragh O'Brien (TD), Dáil Éireann, the Oireachtas; Darragh O'Brien (Minister), Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage; James Lawless (TD), Dáil Éireann, the Oireachtas; Maria Graham (Assistant Secretary), Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage
Intent: Promote improved procedural standards for public bodies when handling Judicial Review applications, ensuring these applications are properly recognized and processedAdvocate for clearer guidelines on document management, particularly regarding proper entity identification in quasi-judicial determinationsSupport reforms that would enhance transparency and accountability in administrative decision-making processes::Encourage policy changes that would prevent mischaracterization of legal proceedings and ensure consistent case referencingPromote better alignment between public bodies' published customer service commitments and their actual administrative practicesAdvocate for measures to ensure timely and clear communication with affected parties throughout administrative proceedings.Support the development of standardized protocols for correcting errors in administrative determinations promptly
Methods: Letter
Details & Methods:
MethodDescription
JUDICIAL REVIEW
2024-09-14
Politician(s) lobbied: Heather Humphreys (TD), Dáil Éireann, the Oireachtas; Niamh Smyth (TD), Dáil Éireann, the Oireachtas; Matt Carthy (TD), Dáil Éireann, the Oireachtas
Intent: The intended results for the judicial review call regarding the Residential Tenancies Board (RTB) are:A comprehensive examination of the RTB's operations, structure, and legal framework.Implementation of reforms to address several key issues, including:a) Systemic inconsistency in decision-makingb) Chronic delays in dispute resolutionc) Ineffective enforcement mechanismsd) Procedural complexity hindering access to justicee) Perceived bias and erosion of public trust::f) Limited jurisdiction and regulatory gapsg) Recurring legal errors and misinterpretation of statutesh) Broader implications for housing policy and social cohesioni) Improved data management and transparencyj) Better resource allocation and organizational structureSpecific recommendations for improvement, such as:Creating a comprehensive database of RTB decisionsEstablishing clear guidelines for interpreting tenancy lawSetting mandatory timelines for case resolution::Simplifying RTB forms and proceduresExpanding the RTB's
Methods: Email
Details & Methods:
MethodDescription
JUDICIAL REVIEW